|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Power and DisagreementInsights into Japanese Learners of English
Ian Walkinshaw
Faculty of Foreign Languages and Asian Studies, Nagoya University of Commerce and Business, Japan, ianwalkinshaw{at}hotmail.com
 This paper reports on a study of disagreement strategies used by Japanese learners of English (JLEs) studying at language schools in New Zealand. The study stemmed from an observation that JLEs were unwilling to express disagreements in exchanges with high-power (+P) interlocutors, possibly due to the threat of face-loss and the consequences of offending a +P interlocutor.
Two questions were considered:
(1) How did the JLEs perceive power distance between themselves and native speakers (NSs), and how did this affect their selection of disagreement strategies with NS interlocutors?
(2) How might their perception of power distance affect how they learned disagreement strategies?
Data was collected from 12 JLEs using a discourse completion task, a series of role-plays and a weekly task sheet. The data revealed that, though the participants were capable of disagreeing with power-equals, they were reluctant to disagree with +P interlocutors. In symmetrical exchanges they employed extended, relatively complex disagreeing strategies, but in power-unequal exchanges they often used short, previously-internalized strategies. The JLEs regarded teachers as power-unequal interlocutors, and consequently they often avoided classroom disagreements, potentially reducing their opportunities to learn and rehearse approaches to disagreement.
Key Words: Disagreement • ESL • face • politeness • power.
References
- Beebe L.M., and M.C. Cummings 1996 ` Natural Speech Act Data versus Written Questionnaire Data: How Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance', in S. Gass and J. Neu (eds.), Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language (New York: Mouton de Gruyter): 65-83.
- Beebe L.M., and T. Takahashi 1989a ` Do You Have a Bag? Social Status and Patterned Variation in Second Language Acquisition', in S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston and L. Selinker (eds.), Variation of Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics ( Clevedon: Multilingual Matters): 104-20.
- 1989 b `Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-threatening Speech Acts ', in M.R. Eisenstein (ed.), The Dynamic Interlanguage (New York: Plenum): 199-216.
- Brown, P., and S. Levinson 1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
- Chaudron, C. 1993 Second Language Classrooms: Research on Teaching and Learning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- French, J.R.P., and B. Raven 1959 `The Bases of Social Power', in D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan ): 150-67.
- Fukushima, S. 2000 Requests and Culture (Bern: Peter Lang).
- Gass, S.M., and N. Houck 1999 Interlanguage Refusals: A Cross-cultural Study of Japanese English (New York: Mouton de Gruyter ).
- Goffman, E. 1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behaviour (New York: Garden City ).
- Gudykunst, W.B., and Y.Y. Kim 2003 Communicating with Strangers: an Approach to Intercultural Communication (New York: McGraw-Hill ).
- Gudykunst, W.B., and S. Ting-Toomey, with E. Chua 1988 Culture and Interpersonal Communication ( Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
- Gumperz, J. 1982 Discourse Strategies (New York: Cambridge University Press).
- Hall, E.T. 1966 The Hidden Dimension (New York: Doubleday).
- Hofstede, G. 1991 Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind (London: McGraw-Hill).
- Jones, T., and M. Remland 1982 Cross-cultural Differences in Self-reported Touch Avoidance (Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association convention ).
- Locher, M.A. 2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).
- Maeshiba, N., N. Yoshinaga, G. Kasper, and S. Ross 1996 `Transfer and Proficiency in Interlanguage Apologising ', in S. Gass and J. Neu (eds.), Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language (New York: Mouton de Gruyter): 155-87.
- Mori, J. 1999 Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connective Expressions and Turn Construction (Amsterdam: John Benjamin).
- Norris, J.M. 2001 ` Use of Address Terms on the German Speaking Test', in K.R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ): 248-82.
- Okabe, R. 1983 `Cultural Assumptions of East and West: Japan and the United States', in W. Gudykunst (ed.), Intercultural Communication Theory: Current Perspectives ( Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
- Pomerantz, A. 1984 `Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 57-101.
- Rees-Miller, J. 2000 `Power, Severity and Context in Disagreement', Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1087-111.[CrossRef]
- Schiffrin, D. 1984 `Jewish Argument as Sociability', Language in Society 13: 311-35.
- Sinclair, J. McH., and M. Coulthard 1992 `Towards an Analysis of Discourse', in M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (London: Routledge): 1-35.
- Takahashi, S., and H.L. Roitblat 1994 `Comprehension Process of Second Language Indirect Requests ', Applied Psycholinguistics 15: 475-506.
- Tannen, D., and C. Kakava 1992 `Power and Solidarity in Modern Greek Conversation: Agreeing to Disagree', Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10(1): 11-34.
- Tsui, A.B.M. 1985 `Analysing Input and Interaction in Second Language Classrooms ', RELC Journal 16: 8-32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Walkinshaw, I. 2004 Disagreement Speech Acts: A Study of Japanese Learners of English (Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington).
RELC Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3,
278-301 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0033688207085848
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
