Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
RELC Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qian, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessing University Students

Searching for an English Language Exit Test

David D. Qian

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong; David.Qian{at}polyu.edu.hk

In order to motivate university students to improve their English profi-ciency, the Hong Kong government decided to adopt a common exit English language test for all graduating students. In the process of selecting a suitable measure for this purpose, an empirical study with a sample of over 240 students was conducted to compare two English proficiency tests, the English Test of the Graduating Students' Language Proficiency Assessment (GSLPA) and the Academic Version of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). The comparisons covered both speaking and writing components of the two tests, based on information provided by the two tests as well as performances of the participating candidates on the components under study. Results indicate: (1) that GSLPA writing and speaking scores distinguish candidates' abilities more clearly than the corresponding scores on the IELTS but IELTS overall scores, generated from writing, speaking, reading and listening sub-scores, have a discriminating power similar to that of GSLPA; (2) that the GSLPA and IELTS writing subtests basically measure different skills; and (3) that the constructs of the GSLPA and IELTS speaking subtests, while having their own distinctive features, overlap by about 48%. This paper recommends options for improving the current assessment framework for graduating university students and discusses the possible impact of such a test on English language teaching and learning.

Key Words: English proficiency test • GSLPA • Hong Kong • IELTS • performance test • speaking assesment • writing test • university exit test

RELC Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, 18-37 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0033688206076156


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?