Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
RELC Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Competing Criteria in the Comprehensibility of Interlanguage Texts: Order of Information Versus Discourse Miscues

Christopher F. Green

Hong Kong Polytechnic University

This paper sets out to test two compering criteria in judgments of the comprehensibility of second language written discourse: the sequencing of information, and the incorporation of appropriate discourse cueing devices The data for this study were derived from Chinese subjects writing argumentative discourse in English In terms of information sequencing, research suggests that Chinese writers of English exhibit a marked tendency to delay the announcement of discourse topic and, in so doing, violate the requirement in English writing for the early statement of topic The relationship between information sequencing and text comprehensibility is made more opaque by the frequent failure of learners to incorporate in their writing appropriate cueing devices (logical connection, reference, tense and aspect and so forth) to guide the reader through the argument In order to investigate the relative importance of order of information vis a vis miscues on perceptions of text comprehensibility, a number of short (student-generated) texts were each manipulated into four versions: original text, miscues intact/order of information rendered linear, miscues corrected/original order of information, miscues corrected/order of information rendered linear The versions were then rated for clarity by fifty English native-speaker university teachers of content subjects. The findings indicate that the overall effect of miscues is perceived to be a more important contributing factor to text comprehensibility than the ordering of information

RELC Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, 72-89 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/003368829802900204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?