Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
RELC Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strategy Training in the Language Classroom: an Empirical Investigation

David Nunan

University of Hong Kong

Although learner strategy training has entered the popular pedagogical imagination, with special journal issues, conferences, and textbooks devoted to the application of strategy training to language leaming, there is still relatively little research into the effect of strategy training on learners and learning processes. The purpose of the study reported here was to investigate the effect of strategy training on four key aspects of the learning process, namely student motivation, students' knowledge of strategies, the perceived utility of strategies, and the actual deployment of strategies by students. The study took the form of an experiment in which sixty first-year Undergraduate students at the University of Hong Kong were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. Both groups took part in that same language program. In addition, the experimental groups were systematically trained in fifteen learning strategies.

Results of the study indicated significant differences in three of the four areas investigated. The experimental groups significantly outperformed the control groups on motivation, knowledge, and perceived utility. There was no significant difference in the area of deployment. Analysis of results on individual strategies revealed that strategy training was neither uniform nor consistent across all strategies. In the concluding section of the paper, the theoretical and pedagogical implications of the study are set out and discussed.

RELC Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 56-81 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/003368829702800204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
A. Mizumoto and O. Takeuchi
Examining the effectiveness of explicit instruction of vocabulary learning strategies with Japanese EFL university students
Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2009; 13(4): 425 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
W.-T. Tseng, Z. Dornyei, and N. Schmitt
A New Approach to Assessing Strategic Learning: The Case of Self-Regulation in Vocabulary Acquisition
Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2006; 27(1): 78 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
L. J. Zhang
Research Into Chinese Efl Learner Strategies: Methods, Findings and Instructional Issues
RELC Journal, December 1, 2003; 34(3): 284 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
M. Spratt, G. Humphreys, and V. Chan
Autonomy and motivation: which comes first?
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2002; 6(3): 245 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]